Kingston
promises for the USB stick HyperX
Savage transfer rates of 350 MB / s read and 250MB / s write. Thus, the new top model of the
manufacturer positioned before the fast Extreme Pro Sandisk. In the test shows: If large files are
written, even Samsung is external SSD Portable T1 overtaken. However, even then.
On a new interface standard which is not, however, because behind the advertised USB 3.1 Generation 1 infected USB 3.0 with up to 5 Gbit / s. Only the name USB 3.1 Gen 2 indicates that twice as high bandwidth of up to 10 Gbit / s. USB 3.0 was quite simply renamed 3.1 Gen 1 in USB.
The
HyperX Savage there are for the time being in three capacities: 64, 128 and 256
GB. Prices range from 40, 80,
respectively 120 Euro. Because
the smallest version has fewer chips, its speed drops when sequential writing
with 180 MB / s of less than the larger models. The DataTraveler HyperX 3.0
predecessor but is beaten by this model, at least on paper.
Compared
to the also around 80 euros expensive 128GB SanDisk Extreme Pro Stick the HyperX Savage is the sequential read
in front. Can compare the stick
must be well with Samsung's Portable SSD T1, which is from 110 euros, per gigabyte
to have currently with 250 gigabytes of capacity even cheaper.
Kingston HyperX Savage 128 GB
The
test object with 128GB brings with dimensions of 76.3 × 23.5 × 12.2 mm
approximately 26 grams on the scale. The series is
offered with a warranty period of five years. The
housing of rubberized plastic is enclosed by a red "X" made of
metal - the hallmark of HyperX product family. The USB-A connector is behind a cover
at one end of the stick, at the other end there is an eyelet for attaching to
your key ring. A blue LED
indicator reports file accesses by blinking.
No details about the technology
There is no information from Kingston to technical base of the USB stick, and
because it can be assumed that opening the damaged hardware, memory controller
and thus remain unknown.
Without the following test
results anticipate: There apparently is no SSD controller like the SanDisk
Extreme Pro 128GB for
use. To what extent this becomes
apparent, showing the following pages.
Test Description
First,
initial tests were performed on a current platform with Skylake CPU (Core
i7-6700K) and Z170 mainboard (Asus Z170-Deluxe), including USB 3.1 (ASMedia)
performed. As described above,
the Kingston HyperX Savage works effectively even with USB 3.0; the abbreviation USB 3.1 does not
matter in this form. While the
Samsung Portable SSD T1 significantly drops the Kingston flash drive while
writing games files behind, prevails in the video files in about a tie - an
indication of the high sequential transfer rates of HyperX Savage.
File
Transfer Steam
In
minutes, seconds
·
109
GB Steam games letter:
·
Samsung
Portable T1 SSD
·
Kingston
HyperX 128 GB
File Transfer Video
In
minutes, seconds
·
3
x 10GB Video letter:
·
Kingston
HyperX 128 GB
·
Samsung
Portable T1 SSD
To have additional comparison
values that were the same test conditions as in the test of the Samsung Portable
SSD T1 created
what is results with the SanDisk Extreme Pro 128GB journeymen
and an external hard drive. Instead
of Plextor M6E Black 256GB came Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB as
system drive and data source used. However,
since not fast PCIe SSD, but the USB port is the limiting factor, the change
has no effect on the performance - for safety, this has been cross-checked. Reading With transfer rates of up to
2,500 MB / s and 1,500 MB / s writing supplies the 950 Pro more than sufficient
reserves for all USB drives.
In addition to the benchmarks AS SSD Benchmark 1.7.4739.38088 and CrystalDiskMark 3.0.3b transfer performance was examined in
practice.
·
Reading
Test: File Transfer from Kingston HyperX Savage (USB 3.0) to Samsung SSD 950
Pro (PCIe)
·
Write
Test: File Transfer from Samsung SSD 950 Pro (PCIe) to Kingston HyperX Savage
(USB 3.0)
As previously with exFAT tested
partition. The Windows write
cache was left "turned off" by default: When changing the cache
memory is usually disabled for fast removal of the drive.
No comments:
Post a Comment